Revoked Executive Order Slashes Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors

March 20, 2025

What This Means for A/E Firms and Project Owners



On Friday, March 14, 2025, President Trump revoked Executive Order 14026, rolling back the federal contractor minimum wage from $17.75 per hour down to the prior EO 13658 level of $13.30.


While political debates rage on, here’s what really matters for A/E firms, contractors, and project owners: pricing strategies and claims just got messy.


If you're in the middle of cost estimating for federal projects stop and re-check your assumptions.


Labor costs are no longer locked to $17.75. On paper, you can now revert to contract wage determination rates, but should you? If you continue paying at the higher rate, will the government honor pending price adjustment requests tied to the now-revoked EO 14026? Or will they stall, leaving contractors holding the bag? Clarification is required.


If you prepare your estimate using lower wage rates and the change in law gets rescinded what will the outcome be on bid day?


Project owners: buckle up.


If you’re working with service or construction contractors, this shift will ripple into your cost baselines. Claims are coming not later, but now.


Contractors who budgeted around EO 14026 will likely seek equitable adjustments or dispute denied price adjustments-the contract might not cover downward price adjustments, however best to check. Expect increased audits, more claims consulting work, and tough conversations about fair compensation versus legal obligation. Depending on your current contract agreements you may not realize any savings. Contractor’s may claim the change in law prevented adequate staffing being available-one of many possible arguments.


A/E Firms: This changes your forecasting immediately.


Cost estimators can’t rely on last quarter’s assumptions. Pricing inputs need to reflect this new reality but also anticipate market reluctance to lower wages overnight. Many contractors won’t reduce rates out of fear of losing labor, especially in a still-tight construction labor market. The result? Estimates that don’t align with real bid pricing, leading to unexpected deltas. As with multiple changes to tariffs will this latest change of law be rescinded at some point.


One more thing (and it’s a big one):


We’ve been asked if this only impacts private contracts. The answer: no. This applies to certain federal service and construction contracts covered by the Davis-Bacon Act (DBA) and Service Contract Act (SCA). The DBA and SCA set wage floors for specific trades and classifications, but EO 14026 required contractors to pay the higher of those wage determinations or the EO minimum wage. Now that EO 14026 is revoked, contractors are no longer required to pay above those DBA or SCA rates unless they choose to for labor retention.


Most trade classifications according to Davis-Bacon schedules are above the $17.75 level however it depends on the geographic location and the construction labor classification. We suggest a quick review of any current Davis-Bacon schedules that may be applicable to your specific project type and location. If the project is weighted towards unskilled labor, then the impact to your project needs to be reviewed.


Translation:

  • If your DBA or SCA rate was already higher than $17.75, this change is largely irrelevant.
  • If it was lower, you’re in the danger zone. Cost estimates, claims, and price adjustments are going to be hot topics over the next few months.


The big question: Will price adjustments already in progress be honored or denied?


Our prediction: litigation and claims activity will surge by summer and confusion will reign.


We’re tracking this carefully and helping our clients evaluate contract language, pricing strategies, and risk positions. If you need help reading between the lines, we’re here.


Has this already impacted your projects or estimates? DM us, we’d love to know how you're handling it.

May 23, 2025
Ever wonder what makes the client experience at The Primestone Group so special?
May 7, 2025
The construction industry is continuing to rush toward sustainability, and for good reasons. Green hydrogen projects, carbon-neutral goals, and net-zero initiatives are changing the landscape of construction and infrastructure development. But beneath the momentum is a quiet truth: sustainable projects carry risks that are often underestimated or misunderstood. For example, new technology, unproven systems, aggressive timelines, and evolving regulations create a risk profile unlike anything seen in traditional construction. Some projects are becoming R & D hot beds. Ignoring these realities is not just a strategic mistake. It is a financial and operational one. Real-World Complexity: Lessons from Green Hydrogen Projects Consider the Intermountain Power Project in Utah, a major initiative transitioning a coal-fired power plant to a green hydrogen hub. The project is pioneering in scope and ambition, but it also highlights several unavoidable realities: Green hydrogen production and storage at this scale are untested over long timelines New transmission systems must integrate with older infrastructure Future-proofing contracts and risk plans must account for technologies that are still evolving Labor, materials, and supply chains are more volatile than traditional builds A new type of skilled labor is required to construct, test and commission these types of projects These are not problems of technical execution alone. They are strategic project risks that must be recognized, modeled, and managed early. Where Sustainable Projects Face Hidden Risks Sustainability goals add layers of risk that traditional project delivery models are not designed to handle. Key areas include: Technology Uncertainty Many green technologies such as hydrogen, carbon capture, and advanced storage are not yet proven at commercial scale. Forecasting performance, maintenance costs, and long-term reliability carries significant uncertainty. Capital Cost Volatility Specialized materials and systems are subject to extreme price fluctuations. Inaccurate early estimates or unrealistic escalation assumptions can undermine project financing and viability. Schedule Disruptions Sourcing renewable energy inputs, specialized components, and skilled labor often extends lead times and introduces new dependencies. Aggressive timelines set during the planning phase can quickly become unrealistic. Regulatory Shifts Policy environments for green energy are rapidly evolving. Regulatory delays, permitting issues, and changes in incentive structures can disrupt projects midway. Dispute and Claims Potential Complexity breeds disputes. As technologies change mid-project or new risks emerge, contract interpretation and scope management become flashpoints for potential claims. What High-Performing Green Projects Get Right Successful sustainable projects are not just well-designed. They are well-prepared. Leading developers and owners are implementing risk management strategies that include: Detailed risk workshops at feasibility and pre-construction stages Early involvement of all project stakeholders including regulatory bodies and permitting officials Adaptive contracting models that anticipate technology shifts Integrated project controls that monitor evolving cost and schedule risk Realistic scheduling buffers based on emerging supply chain realities Early identification of potential claims exposures and dispute resolution frameworks Adequate contingency planning in terms of costs, alternative solutions and schedule criteria Risk is no longer a static checklist. It is a dynamic, ongoing exercise that requires expertise, discipline, and constant recalibration. Looking Ahead: Building Smarter, Not Just Greener The future of construction will absolutely be greener, but building smarter requires recognizing that innovation without discipline is a liability. Sustainability must be matched with rigorous project planning, expert risk analysis, and contractual structures flexible enough to manage uncertainty. Projects like Intermountain show what is possible. They also show that success is about more than ambition. It is about understanding where the real risks lie and having the operational expertise to manage them before they become crises.
By looka_production_156706265 May 2, 2025
Labor Shortages, Apprenticeships, and the New Reality Impacting Construction Costs